Journal Information
Download PDF
More article options
Original Research
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2021.05.003
Full text access
Available online 11 June 2021
Through the athlete lens: A novel study exploring the perspectives and experiences of injury prevention practices in women playing elite Australian Football
Andrea M. Brudera,c,
Corresponding author

Corresponding author at: School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, Physiotherapy, La Trobe University, Melbourne 3086, Australia.
, Kay M. Crossleya,c, Alex Donaldsonb, Andrea B. Moslera,c
a School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Australia
b Centre for Sport and Social Impact, La Trobe University, Australia
c La Trobe Sport and Exercise Medicine Research Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia

  • Athletes believe injury prevention practices have multiple aims and benefits.

  • Lack of knowledge, time, and competing demands were perceived as program barriers.

  • Education, resources, and positive club culture facilitated program adoption.

  • Full-time professional contracts and improved resources may enhance implementation.

  • Program implementation is a shared responsibility.

Received 17 July 2020. Accepted 06 May 2021
Article information
Full Text
Download PDF
Figures (2)
Tables (4)
Table 1. Theme 1: IPPs minimise injury risk and enhance athletic performance and longevity.
Table 2. Theme 2. Perceptions of injury prevention practices vary.
Table 3. Theme 3: IPP adoption and implementation is complex and multifactorial.
Table 4. Theme 4: Implementation could be enhanced through education and resources, including support staff.
Show moreShow less

Efficacious injury prevention programs exist, yet translation to practice in real-world settings is poor. Little is known about how women playing elite team ball-sports perceive and experience injury prevention programs in practice. Understanding the end-user's (athlete's) perspective is essential to improve program uptake and adherence.


To explore the perspectives and experiences of injury prevention practices in athletes from the elite Australian Football League for Women (AFLW).


Convenience sample of 13 athletes from three AFLW clubs. Semi-structured interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim, analysed with a thematic analysis approach, and classified within the Socio-Ecological Model (SEM).


Women playing elite Australian Football: (1) believe injury prevention programs have multiple aims and benefits, (2) perceive varying injury prevention practices between and within AFLW clubs, (3) believe injury prevention program adoption and implementation is complex and multi-factorial, and (4) think implementing injury prevention programs in the AFLW could be enhanced through education and resources. Mapping our results onto the SEM highlighted that athletes perceive multiple ecological levels (i.e. individual, interpersonal, community, and organizational) are involved in sports injury prevention.


Multi-level engagement strategies are required to enhance injury prevention program adoption and implementation and to maximise athlete adherence.

Anterior cruciate ligament
Qualitative research
Full Text

A national elite Australian Football League for Women (AFLW) was introduced in 2017. Women playing in this novel competition have a 6 times greater risk of serious knee injury compared to their male counterparts.42 Injury prevention exercise programs are efficacious in reducing knee injury risk in other team ball-sports.1–4 A recent meta-analysis of meta-analyses found women participating in these programs can reduce their risk of non-contact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury by 67%.1,5 Furthermore, risk of injury reduces with greater athlete program adherance.6–8 However, there is currently no knee-specific injury prevention program optimised for women playing elite Australian Football available.

Widespread adoption and implementation of efficacious injury prevention programs with high fidelity is challenging in real-world sporting settings.9,10 Varying intervention strategies are described in the literature as injury prevention such as: exercise programs, nutrition, protective equipment, load management, and screening.11 For clarity, in this manuscript these strategies are referred to as the encompassing term of injury prevention practices (IPP). To improve program adoption, implementation, and adherence, an understanding of end-user perceptions and behaviour using qualitative research methods is required.12 The importance of engaging end-users (i.e. athletes) in IPPs is recognised in frameworks to evaluate implementation success.13 However, the perspectives and experiences of IPPs amongst women playing elite team ball-sports has rarely been investigated.14 Giving athletes a voice to share their experiences, perceptions, and recommendations on IPPs is critical to improve the translation of sports injury prevention research into real-world settings.15

Sports injury prevention research is complex16 and there are many individual, sociocultural, and environmental factors, including individual behaviour, which affect program implementation.17,18 The Socio-Ecological Model (SEM) provides a framework to understand the interaction and influence of the factors (i.e. individual, socio-cultural, environmental) that impact human behaviour.19 The SEM has been applied in injury prevention research20–22 and is recommended as an approach to understand facilitators and barriers to injury prevention program implementation in sports medicine.21

The athlete's perspectives and experiences are crucial to ensuring contextually relevant, feasible IPPs are developed, adopted, implemented, and adhered to in the AFLW. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore the perspectives and experiences of IPPs amongst women playing elite Australian Football to: (1) gain an understanding of current female athlete knowledge and experiences of IPPs in Australian Football, (2) explore the perceived barriers and facilitators to implementing IPPs in women's Australian Football, and (3) inform the development and implementation of future ACL IPPs in the AFLW.


The La Trobe University Human Research and Ethics Committee approved this study [S17–217]. The Australian Football League (AFL) supported this study, and we have applied the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) checklist.23

Research design

Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted at the end of the 2018 AFLW season to explore the perspectives and experiences of IPPs amongst women playing elite Australian Football. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using a thematic analysis approach.24


A sample of convenience of female athletes were recruited from three Melbourne-based AFLW clubs (eight clubs were involved in the first two seasons of the national AFLW). The three recruited clubs had developed and embedded their own IPP informed by evidence-based programs25,26 into their pre-season and in-season training and match day preparation. To ensure maximum sample variation27 physical therapists identified potential interviewees based on: (1) one versus two years AFLW experience, (2) total years of Australian Football experience at any level categorised into <3 years, 3–5, >5 years, (3) other sporting experience at different competition levels. They were not directed to identify athlete's based on previous injury history. All potential participants provided written, informed consent before being interviewed.

Data collection

Thirteen athletes were interviewed by a female academic and physical therapist (AB) who had previous experience in conducting semi-structured interviews and had no prior relationship with the participants. Interviewees provided sociodemographic information including their age, number of years playing elite Australian Football and other sporting experience, including level of attainment. The interview guide was developed by the study authors (AB, AM, KC), who have clinical and research experience in sports injury prevention. The interview guide was broad and flexible to probe athletes about their perceptions, experiences, and recommendations for IPPs. Where participants expanded on responses that covered multiple questions, the interviewer omitted some questions from the interview guide. Prompts or re-wording of questions were used if a participant had difficulty generating a response. Interviews were conducted around end of season musculoskeletal screening and exit interviews, five to 10 days after the final competitive game of the 2018 AFLW season. The interviews averaged 15 min (range, 9–26 min) and no new interviews were conducted when data saturation (i.e. no new ideas generated) was reached.

Data analysis

Audio-recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim by an independent professional transcription service. Transcripts were imported into NVivo qualitative data analysis software (QSR International Pty Ltd, Victoria, Australia, Version 12.6 2019).

Qualitative thematic analysis using an inductive approach was undertaken to address the limited and fragmented knowledge in this area.24,28 Two researchers (AB, AM) read and re-read each transcript to immerse themselves in, and make sense of the data (Fig. 1). Codes were generated from words and phrases spoken by the participants. Both researchers independently organised the data of three transcripts through open coding and creating categories. Rich, thick descriptions were extracted to substantiate the degree of fit with the categories and to facilitate transferability to other contexts.29 Differences in coding and categories were discussed and the original data were re-read until consensus was reached. The authors independently coded and categorised the remaining transcripts before grouping under themes that emerged from the player's responses to the interview guide (e.g. purpose, barriers, facilitators, improvements). New categories emerged as the researchers moved back and forth between transcripts and analysis. Once themes and categories were finalised, two researchers (AB, AM) independently mapped each category to the relevant level of the SEM and consensus was reached.

Fig. 1.

The Socio-Ecological Model (SEM) applicable to elite female Australian Football (AF) players (adapted from Bogardus et al., 2019) *specific ideas generated for each level of the SEM can be found in Tables 1–4. ?? Each Australian Football League club includes professional men's and women's Australian Football League teams, and men's and women's state league teams.


Athletes were on average 25 years of age (range 19–31), played an average of 1.7 AFLW seasons (range 1–2), with 2 to 15 years of AF experience (mean 8.2). All athletes had played a sport other than Australian Football. Three played in another sport at an elite level (two team-sport, one individual sport), and five athletes played team-sport at any other level. Two athletes reported a history of lower limb injury in the previous 12 months, which resulted in missing two games. One athlete reported previous ACL reconstruction. Perceived time dedicated to IPPs per training session ranged from 10 to 135 min (Club 1 30–80 mins, Club 2 15–50 mins, Club 3, 10–130 mins). This section describes each of the four key themes that emerged from the 13 interviews conducted using quotes from the interviews to illustrate that theme and the relationship of each theme to the SEM (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Data analysis process.

Theme 1. IPPs minimise injury risk and enhance athletic performance and longevity

All athletes believed IPPs could minimise injury risk (Table 1). Specifically, they were aware that women playing Australian Football had a greater risk of knee injury and a lower risk of soft tissue injuries such as hamstring and groin injuries, compared to men. IPPs were perceived to have immediate benefits (e.g. enhance performance, activity preparation), but could also prolong their elite sporting career. Athletes believed their coaches and medical team played an important role in the successful implementation of IPPs.

Table 1.

Theme 1: IPPs minimise injury risk and enhance athletic performance and longevity.

SEM level  Category  Quote 
Interpersonal (AFLW team)  Screening and monitoring  “(…) ongoing checking in by medical staff to see how you are going and I guess telling them on the track to see how we are performing, notice whether we're walking differently or just brushing it aside, make note of that (…)” (A11) 
Individual (AFLW athlete)Prevent injury  “(…) prevent injuries and also raise awareness as to how injuries can be prevented” (A7) “I think there's more that can be done to prevent injuries. (…)” (A11) “prevent serious knee injury” (A12) 
Activity preparation  “(…) but I think it's about firing you up for the game, getting you in the best state for the game, so getting your muscles warm, feeling like you can run on top of the ground, you can bend down, you either go from when the game starts” (A8) 
Enhance performance  “(…) help you perform better because then you're not playing with injury or you're not playing half warmed up in terms of all the muscles are firing. You can run faster, jump higher, get down lower without (…) hesitating to get down lower” (A8) 
Prolong career  “(…) prolong how long you play for, because if you manage yourself now, then there won't be many problems in the future, I think.” (A3) “A hundred percent agree that it prolongs your career.” (A6) 
Movement body awareness  “(…) activating the muscles. Just like your finer muscles that you wouldn't sort of activate, (…) because probably everyone's worked all day (…)” (A8) 
Psychological effect  “It's (…) good for your mind as well that you can step out there and know that you've done everything you can to prevent a knee injury or a whatever injury it is.” (A13 “I have in my head that if I don't do this, I risk an ACL (…)” (A11) 
Recover and body maintenance  “to cope with the demands of being in a semi-elite environment” (A2) “Increase strength, flexibility, just general wellbeing and body maintenance as well” (A5) “Your recovery and then just nutrition and hydration (…)” (A10) 
Injury management  “I had my knee reco, I had to wait for my surgery, so I was able to do a lot of prehab, so I was able to come back six months after my surgery.”(A12) 

In the quotes, brackets () are used for additions by the authors, and (…) is used when the quotes have been shortened. SEM = Socio-Ecological Model.

Theme 2. Perceptions of IPPs vary

All athletes stated that they participated in IPPs during most training sessions and games (Table 2). Injury prevention activities were scheduled at the start of group training, but also included individual pre-training preparation time. IPPs that were described included: sport- and/or individual-specific exercises to: improve strength, muscle activation, muscle length, range of motion, movement awareness, activity preparation, and recovery techniques. Exercises were performed in the club rooms and/or on-field. Athletes who perceived resistance training and/or recovery strategies were components of IPPs also reported the gym and ice baths as locations for delivery. Athletes stated that they received education, however perceptions varied within clubs.

Table 2.

Theme 2. Perceptions of injury prevention practices vary.

SEM level  Category  Quote 
Community (AF)  Program designer and implementer  “I think the AFL too, to make sure that the right research and stuff is being done to filter down to professionals working at the club, programs to be implemented.” (A9) 
Organization (Club)  Number of staff  “So we had two, maybe three, high performance coaches with us, which is good.” (A10) “The lady that came in all the time and helped us do it.” (A4) “(…) there was so many people trying to get massages, or there wasn't enough staff” (A8) “(…) lots of staff, a staff overload (…)” (A9) 
Interpersonal (AFLW team)Program structure (frequency, duration, setting)  “I'd say 35 to 45 min pre-training, then off into the rooms for education, we go out, do another twenty minute warm-up drill (…) (A11) “So, we had warm-ups which went for maybe fifteen minutes, and then we had gym, which I think is an injury session for building up the muscles, that was half an hour, 45 min, and then recovery, I think that actually also comes into it, about fifteen minutes so overall that was about an hour and twenty, three times a week.” (A6) 
Program content  “(…) exercises and skill related activities that help strengthen particular exercises in order to prevent injuries.” (A7) “We did a lot of knee stability stuff, our game's pretty rough on the knee, and it includes all the balancing aspect which made it all better.” (A13) 
Program designer and implementer  “(…) the high performance team and medical staff, strength and conditioning. (A11) “I think it's like a collective. It's up to I guess the professionals at the club.” (A9) “So during training and before training and games it was S & C” (A5) 
Provision of education  “So our physical therapist and trainers explained it to us.” (A5) “Yes, at the first session, all the coaches would have gone through them and why.” (A3) 
Adherence  “(…) from a program perspective I think your strength and conditioning staff and your medical staff.” (A13) “I guess team mates more so than anything, pull you up.” (A4) 
Individual (AFLW athlete)Gaining knowledge  “(…) all you have to do is reach out and someone will be pointing you in the right direction.” (A10) 
Adherence  “(…) there's ownership on us that if they teach us the correct technique then we'll go away and do that. (A10) “I think it's us as the players.” (A3) 
Program designer and implementer  “and then in your own time no-one did, it's up to you.” (A5) “(…) I think we know our bodies, so we could (be involved) in the coming up of the program” (A6) 

In the quotes, brackets () are used for additions by the authors, and (…) is used when the quotes have been shortened. SEM = Socio-Ecological Model.

Club 1

“Yeah, definitely.” (A8) “So our physical therapist and trainers explained it to us.” (A5) “It was probably pretty brief, at the start, before we did the program, before the season. We were just made aware that we'd all be doing it.” (A7) “No.” (A6)

Club 2

“Obviously it was delivered” (A2) “Yes, at the first session, all the coaches would have gone through them and why.” (A3) “Not too much. It was just I guess a brief rundown of the potential injuries and these are some ways to manage it. There was no sort of specific details.” (A1) “I can't even remember (…) Somebody talked about something.” (A4)

Club 3

“(…) yes, constantly.” (A9) “(…) had a sort of a meeting with us but I feel like that's something they can improve” (A10) “Not too much” (A11), “ (…) I don't think we've gotten any, like I can't remember a presentation or anything explaining everything (…)” (A13) “None” (A12)

All athletes believed the design and delivery of IPPs was a group effort that included the physical therapist, strength and conditioning and high-performance coaches, and medical staff. Although athletes were not involved in designing current IPPs, they felt they could play a part, “(…) I think we know our bodies, so we could (be involved) in the coming up of the program” (A6). Athletes believed that IPP adherence was the responsibility of themselves, coaches, and teammates.

Theme 3. IPP adoption and implementation is complex and multi-factorial

Athletes recognised many barriers and facilitators to IPP adoption and implementation across multiple SEM levels (individual, interpersonal, organization, community). Some categories were evident as both facilitators and barriers. For example, lack of athlete injury prevention knowledge was recognised as a barrier and acquiring knowledge was a facilitator that could have motivated athletes to adhere to IPPs (Table 3). Knowledge was recognised as a barrier to the individual, likely to be influenced by competing demands and a lack of time at the individual, interpersonal, and organizational level. Ultimately, knowledge (or lack thereof) was impacted by professional contracts that limited the time athletes could train and the financial reimbursement they would receive. This meant that athletes often worked full-time jobs, and/or studied, minimising the time and energy they could devote to their AFLW careers. It was clear that although athletes had good intentions to adhere to IPPs, the program structure, and a lack of previous football experience amongst some athletes meant that football-specific skills and meetings with coaches to improve their football performance were prioritized over IPPs. Supervision and individualised feedback on technique facilitated adherence, as did allocating training time to IPPs in a motivating and supported team environment.

Table 3.

Theme 3: IPP adoption and implementation is complex and multifactorial.

SEM level  Category  Quote 
Barriers to IPP adoption and implementation
Community (AF)  Professional contracts  “We only have a certain amount of hours you can train (…)” (A12) 
  Knowledge and experience  “But some of the young girls here have come from community football clubs. They need to know this. It's crucial” (A12) “Not having an understanding of what you're actually doing. For the first year players, who haven't been exposed to it” (A2) “We are new to it.” (A6) 
Organization (Club)  Equipment  “Maybe like, I guess, halfway through the season, towards the end of the season, we were lacking resources, just, bands break and stuff like that” (A11) “(…) there's not enough equipment to use (…)” (A1) 
  Facilities  “(…) space, in the gym, there wasn't a lot of space.” (A8) 
  Number of staff  “(…) too many (athletes) to the actual individual (staff) sort of training and coaching” (A1) 
Interpersonal (AFLW team)  Time allocated by the coach  “(…) we didn't have much time” (A3) “We don't have a lot of time so it's crammed in” (A10) “If you had to go into the physical therapist to get taped, I guess one of the things you would push aside is injury prevention” (A11) 
  Competing demands with club personnel (Time)  “(…) we were always rushed as well and that's the same time as our physical therapist and massage, so you had to get the prep done first and then you could go, get a massage” (A3) It shouldn't be the case but when you're rushed for time, you'd rather miss (injury prevention exercises) than education with the coaches” (A11) 
  Program structure (Time)  “I think if it went too long” (A5) 
Individual (AFLW athlete)  Competing personal demands (Time)  “I guess being a part time athlete you've got to work full time (…)” (A11) “I think like external stuff, like just the amount of … during the week when we're not at the club, and having to work or yeah, go to uni (…)” (A9) 
  Knowledge and experience  “Not having an understanding of what you're actually doing.” (A2) “(…) we're just sort of discovering ourselves as athletes now, because we weren't really before, so just I guess learning your body and that sort of thing.” (A13) 
  Lack of motivation  I started doing it before every training, and then as the season's gone on, I've stopped doing it and I think it was just because I was tired (…) (A12) “some girls don't actually think it's worth it” (A3) 
  Current symptoms and injuries  “Sometimes it was easier to just foam roll for a little while because you had so many niggles (…)” (A8) 
Organization (club)  Culture  “(…) just being at an AFL club and being that environment that values that and the professionals there to drive it (…). The fact that we're there in the AFL club.” (A9) 
  Equipment  “Just having the equipment ready to use, (…) there's no reason to not do it, the equipment's there.” (A13) 
  Facilities  “(…) we've got access to the facilities all the time so you come in and use the ice baths on off days, or any time we want really.” (A11) 
Interpersonal (AFLW team)  Support staff  “So, having the strength and conditioning coach take the warm-up, having a physical therapist available to clarify questions (…)” (A2) “(the staff) were always on time. And they were always ready to assist.” (A8) 
  Supervision and feedback  “(…) having coaches there all the time, like high performance, strength and conditioning coaches being there all the time was really beneficial. (…) making sure you are doing it to the best of your ability.” (A11) 
  Delivery of education  “I think what actually helped now on reflection was when our physical therapist said, the studies all show that this prevents this. And so for me having that evidence made me do it.” (A5) “They were always happy to share information (…)” (A8) 
  Program structure  “There was often a piece of paper telling you exactly what all the exercises were and then yeah, just them being really well scheduled. So it never really deviated too much.” (A8) 
  Group enjoyment, fun and motivation  “If we're doing it as a team as well, it sort of makes it a lot more fun. If you're doing planks on your own, it's not as fun (…) doing it as a team is character building” (A13) 
Individual (AFLW athlete)  Gaining knowledge (including evidence)  “I think that again what helped me personally was knowing its relevance, and so whether that's just the quick statement about why, for me that's enough, but for other people it might be different.” (A5) “I think having the knowledge of what you're doing (…)” (A6) 
  Motivation  “(…) the knowledge around it, like how it actually does prevent injury (…) it definitely motivated me to do the exercises.” (A7) 
  Previous injury prevention experience  “Yeah, I had a (injury prevention program when I was playing) rugby union (…).” (A11) “I guess being more open to it because I've experienced it (a groin injury) and relied on an injury prevention program.” (A9) 
  Current symptoms and injuries  “I think if the girls actually don't have any injuries, that they're feeling fresh and they don't actually have any sore spots, that would actually show them that it's actually working (…)” (A3) 

In the quotes, brackets () are used for additions by the authors, and (…) is used when the quotes have been shortened. SEM, Socio-ecological model.

Theme 4. Implementation could be enhanced through education and resources, including support staff

Athletes suggested IPP implementation strategies across all SEM levels except policy-makers (Table 4,Fig. 2), with some strategies relevant across multiple levels. For example, athletes identified a need to gain knowledge about injury prevention (individual) that could be provided by their coaches and medical team (interpersonal). Athletes wanted to know more about why injury prevention is important, what they can do to reduce their injury risk and individualised supervision and feedback around body movement awareness during exercise. Assuming a holistic approach to injury prevention, athletes suggested topics such as nutrition and menstrual cycles could also be relevant to reduce injury risk. Practical suggestions such as access to more equipment and space within facilities were identified as ways to improve IPP implementation.

Table 4.

Theme 4: Implementation could be enhanced through education and resources, including support staff.

SEM level  Category  Quote 
Community (AF)  Professional contracts  “We just need to become full time athletes. If girls are able to get to training before the start time that would help but 1) We aren't contracted to be there until the start time and 2) A lot of us work full time and it's not possible to get there early!” (A2) “(…) more time, like, to be able to train and prepare and obviously going from footy, which is only part time at the moment.” (A9) 
Organization (Club)Facilities  “(…) and then space, in the gym, there wasn't a lot of space.” (A8) 
Equipment  “(…) halfway through the season, towards the end of the season, we were lacking resources (…) (A11) 
Program structure  “I would suggest that clubs implement this sort of program as a team, so make it, so you have to do it. We have to get in and fully recover, have to do the prehab stuff.” (A12) 
Number of experienced staff  “(…) to be one on one with a member of the Strength & Conditioning staff or the physical therapists, to sort of go through (…)” (A8) 
Interpersonal (AFLW team)Delivery of education (content and mode)  “(…) maybe some more education, like how certain things might affect our chances (…) how something might, we might not even realize how certain things might increase our risk of injury, like, whether it's to do with, I don't know, diet, or obviously biologically, like in terms, when we have our periods, whether or not that's an influencing factor in things we should be mindful of, or we could do to prevent certain things.” (A9) “Yes, I do think at the start of the season and pre-season as well, just so I guess we're all on the same page, where you're at and everything.” (A3) “Maybe online resources can be good.” (A4) “(…) a session one on one with the strength and conditioning coaches (…)” (A11) “a talk, almost like an interactive presentation.” (A11) 
Athlete and sport specific  “I think it should include specific exercises for women, because we are a different body to men. You know, our muscles are different and our bodies are just a bit built differently (…)” (A6) “(…) I guess more specific to our bodies, our training programs are based on men's programs, whether or not there are any differences in how we need to train or not.” (A9)“(…) I think you could almost do a bit of … like, nothing sort of prepares you for those first initial contact at training, so I don't know whether you can incorporate some sort of contact”. “But yeah, I just feel like it's all well and good to jump up and down, like try and pick up a ground ball, unless you've got someone like in a game where you feel pressure on, or someone knocks you while you're in mid-air. It's hard to sort of replicate those movements.” (A8) 
Supervision and feedback  “having a session one on one with the strength and conditioning coaches, to see how, what you were doing and why you were doing that for your position based, and then coming to this program, where it's thirty people all doing exact exercises.” (A11) “We are new to it (playing Australian Football) (…) feedback on how we're going and an explanation of what the actual experience for us.” (A6) 
Time  “Maybe a bit more support from the football coaching staff, (…) to allow more time for it (injury prevention program) to be completed to the best of our ability with as much effort and time that it needs and deserves.” (A11) 
Program structure  “If I was coaching a program, I'd definitely implement it in the training.” (A12) “(…) I think going forward next year, if we've got a really set structure of what we're doing, and then you can present it so we understand exactly what each movement is.” (A13) 
Culture  “Maybe a bit more support from the football coaching staff, just to maybe prioritize (injury prevention strategies) (…)” (A11) 
Individual (AFLW athlete)Gaining knowledge (including evidence)  “I guess if there are studies or stuff or info-graphics or things that you could put up where girls could read it in their own time, or whatever, just little things.” (A13) 
Program designer and implementer  “Because it needs to come from the players – we're the ones trying to prolong our career and get the most out of it.” (A8) 

In the quotes, brackets () are used for additions by the authors, and (…) is used when the quotes have been shortened. SEM = Socio-Ecological Model.


Adult women playing elite Australian Football: (1) believe IPPs have multiple aims and benefits, (2) perceive varying IPPs between and within AFLW clubs, (3) believe IPP adoption and implementation is complex and multi-factorial, and (4) think implementing IPPs could be enhanced through education and resources, including support staff. Mapping our findings to the SEM highlighted the multiple levels that athletes perceive they are involved in sports injury prevention (Fig. 2). This suggests the need to develop multi-level targeted engagement strategies to support IPP implementation and athlete adherence emphasising the perspectives of the end-users and benefiters of these practices.

Women playing elite Australian Football value IPPs. Consistent with female Olympic athletes, professional male soccer players, and their physical therapists and coaches,30,31 AFLW athletes believe IPPs can reduce injury risk. They also perceive additional program benefits including physical and mental preparation for activity, performance enhancement, career longevity, recovery, and body awareness.

Coaches of female soccer players perceive IPPs enhance performance,32 and coach adoption and athlete adherence could be improved by changing how these programs are ‘sold’.33 Our findings highlight the need to ‘sell’ IPPs differently to different intended users (e.g. coaches versus players) and at different levels of the SEM (i.e. individual versus organisation). Despite preliminary evidence that sport-specific IPPs may improve athletic performance,33,354 the benefits in the AFLW are unknown. Interestingly, no athletes reported interpersonal or organisational level benefits of IPPs such as improved team success with less injuries.35 This may reflect that athletes perceive different IPP barriers and facilitators than staff members.31 Therefore, integrating all stakeholders’ perspectives when planning and implementing sports IPPs is required to increase adoption of these practices.

Elite AFLW players’ injury prevention experiences vary between and within clubs. They believed a collective group of professionals was responsible for IPP design and that athletes could contribute, yet none reported involvement in current program design (Table 3). Varying perspectives of experiences with program content were reported. We expected variation in program duration between teams but not the considerable variation in athlete perception of program duration within teams. This may be explained by the variation in players’ perceived knowledge, confidence, and understanding of what constituted injury prevention. Clearly, an opportunity exists for IPP education at the club and athlete level, and to engage athletes in co-creating programs.43 Giving athletes a voice in practices they are asked to adhere to may increase ownership and motivation, ultimately leading to greater adherence and injury risk reduction benefits.

Knowledge, or the lack thereof, was identified as both a facilitator and barrier to IPP adoption and implementation. The varied interpretation of injury prevention education experiences suggests that using different presentation methods tailored to the individual athlete's needs may be more effective. Interviewees wanted to know what, why and how IPPs are important. They also suggested developing organisation and community level resources including: infographics, videos, and mandatory education presentations like those they receive on other topics. Athletes suggested players could take greater personal responsibility for adopting IPPs. Education on the value of IPPs and providing support to individual players to own them could facilitate IPP adherence. However, increasing injury prevention knowledge will not automatically translate to changed behaviour,36 and success will depend on applying a complex-systems approach with strategies at multiple levels (individual, socio-cultural, environmental).37

Sex-, sport-, and athlete-specific IPPs are desired; but the adoption and implementation of these are complex and multifactorial. There is little evidence that the perspectives and experiences of IPPs in female, elite athletes have been explored and addressed when designing and implementing IPPs. This may contribute to the low program adherence in the real-world.14 Our findings suggest that AFLW athletes face many psychological, social, and contextual challenges in adopting IPPs which may contribute to increasing their injury risk. This supports previous research, where athletes perceive multi-level interactional factors that influence IPP implementation.30 Specifically, athletes identified challenges of playing in a semi-professional environment requiring juggling competing demands of work, football training, skill development, and commuting. To be successful elite Australian Football athletes, changes are required at many levels. Athletes need the opportunity to focus on developing their sport-specific skills, strength and conditioning, and mental well-being with additional resources required to succeed in an elite environment and reduced injury risk.38

Athlete-generated ideas concentrated around the individual and interpersonal level of the SEM with few suggestions mapped to the organization and community levels (Fig. 1). This may reflect that athletes perceive a narrow sphere of influence and they acknowledge the importance of the team environment on individual athlete behaviour. Nonetheless, athletes perceive the football governing body could play an important role in adopting and implementing IPPs developed specifically for them as end-users. The professional contracts currently offered to women playing elite Australian Football limit their capacity to be full-time athletes. The AFL Players’ Association is critical to advocating for enterprise bargaining agreements which allow female athletes the time, support, and opportunity to develop their football skills while still adhering to IPPs. Organization level changes to resources and culture were suggested by the athletes to facilitate IPP implementation. While not specifically identified by the players, the impact of existing imbalances in resource allocation between men and women on the implementation of IPPs requires further exploration. The athletes generally felt well supported at the club level. This may reflect the stark contrast from playing in sub-elite and community teams and clubs that often-lacked equipment and relied on volunteer staff. As previously identified, a system wide ecological approach to IPP implementation is required to create the change that the athletes have suggested.32,39

Methodological strengths and limitations

Member checking (interviewee verification of transcribed interviewees) was used to enhance data reliability.40 All interviewees had 14 days to verify that the data accurately reflected their interview. One athlete expanded on their responses. To ensure trustworthiness and rigour, two investigators (AB, AM) independently coded the data that were previously checked by interviewees for errors before consensus was reached. One researcher had met the participants and conducted the interviews (AB), and one had not (AM), providing different perspectives and building confidence in the study findings.41 Although we interviewed 13 AFLW athletes with a range of Australian Football (at any level) and AFLW experience, the concepts that have emerged from these data could be relevant to injury prevention efforts in similar settings e.g. women playing sub-elite or elite team ball-sports. To maximise convenience for the athletes, interviews were conducted around end-of-season musculoskeletal screening and club exit interviews. Therefore, some athletes may have been focused on other tasks and unable to provide detailed or well considered responses. However, athletes reviewed and revised their responses, thereby minimising this limitation and enhancing credibility of the findings.


Women playing elite Australian Football have perspectives and experiences that add considerable value to the development of IPPs. Their beliefs provide insight into strategies that might enhance player program adherence. Varied experiences and knowledge reveal the need to customise program content and education for different skill and literacy levels. Our findings support athletes as critical stakeholders who are well-positioned to inform IPP development. By doing so, they can identify meaningful and relevant opportunities at multiple ecological levels to enhance IPP implementation and effectiveness.


The authors would like to thank all participating athletes for their valuable participation in this study. This work was supported by the Australian Football League Research Board [2017]; La Trobe University Social Research Assistance Platform [2018]; and Andrea Mosler is supported by an NHMRC Early Career Fellowship (ECF 1156674). The funding bodies did not have any role in the design of the study or in collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, or in writing the manuscript.

K.M. Crossley, B.E. Patterson, A.G. Culvenor, et al.
Making football safer for women: a systematic review and meta-analysis of injury prevention programmes in 11 773 female football (soccer) players.
Br J Sports Med, 54 (2020), pp. 1089-1098
J. Gilchrist, B.R. Mandelbaum, H. Melancon, et al.
A randomized controlled trial to prevent noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injury in female collegiate soccer players.
Am J Sports Med, 36 (2008), pp. 1476-1483
A. Kiani, E. Hellquist, K. Ahlqvist, et al.
Prevention of soccer-related knee injuries in teenaged girls.
Arch Intern Med, 170 (2010), pp. 43-49
M. Waldén, I. Atroshi, H. Magnusson, et al.
Prevention of acute knee injuries in adolescent female football players: cluster randomised controlled trial.
K. Webster, T. Hewett.
Meta-analysis of meta-analyses of anterior cruciate ligament injury reduction training programs.
J Orthop Res, 36 (2018), pp. 2696-2708
M. Hägglund, I. Atroshi, P. Wagner, et al.
Superior compliance with a neuromuscular training programme is associated with fewer ACL injuries and fewer acute knee injuries in female adolescent football players: secondary analysis of an RCT.
Br J Sports Med, 47 (2013), pp. 974-979
K. Steffen, C.A. Emery, M. Romiti, et al.
High adherence to a neuromuscular injury prevention programme (FIFA 11+) improves functional balance and reduces injury risk in Canadian youth female football players: a cluster randomised trial.
Br J Sports Med, 47 (2013), pp. 794-802
K. Thorborg, K. Krommes, E. Esteve, et al.
Effect of specific exercise-based football injury prevention programmes on the overall injury rate in football: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the FIFA 11 and 11+ programmes.
Br J Sports Med, 51 (2017), pp. 562-571
M. Bizzini, J. Dvorak.
FIFA 11+: an effective programme to prevent football injuries in various player groups worldwide-a narrative review.
Br J Sports Med, 49 (2015), pp. 577-579
J. O'Brien, C. Finch.
The implementation of musculoskeletal injury-prevention exercise programmes in team ball sports: a systematic review employing the RE-AIM framework.
Sports med, 44 (2014), pp. 1305-1318
A. McCall, M. Davison, T.E. Andersen, et al.
Injury prevention strategies at the FIFA 2014 World Cup: perceptions and practices of the physicians from the 32 participating national teams.
Br J Sports Med, 49 (2015), pp. 603-608
E. Verhagen, C. Bolling.
We dare to ask new questions. Are we also brave enough to change our approaches?.
Transl Sports Med, 1 (2018), pp. 54-55
R. Glasgow, S. Harden, B. Gaglio, et al.
RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework: adapting to New Science and Practice With a 20-Year Review.
Front Public Health, 7 (2019), pp. 64
S.H. Andersson, R. Bahr, M.J. Olsen, et al.
Attitudes, beliefs, and behavior toward shoulder injury prevention in elite handball: fertile ground for implementation.
Scand J Med Sci Sports, 29 (2019), pp. 1996-2009
A. Donaldson, C. Finch.
Planning for implementation and translation: seek first to understand the end-users' perspectives.
Br J Sports Med, 46 (2012), pp. 306-307
S. Bekker, A. Clark.
Bringing complexity to sports injury prevention research: from simplification to explanation.
Br J Sports Med, 50 (2016), pp. 1489-1490
C. Finch.
A new framework for research leading to sports injury prevention.
J Sci Med Sport, 9 (2006), pp. 3-9
J. O'Brien, C. Finch, R. Pruna, A. McCall.
A new model for injury prevention in team sports: the Team-sport Injury Prevention (TIP) cycle.
Sci Med Football, 3 (2019), pp. 77-80
U. Bronfenbrenner.
Ecological systems theory.
Six Theories of Child Development: Revised Formulations and Current Issues.Vol 6, pp. 187-249
R. Bogardus, R. Martin, A. Richman, et al.
Applying the Socio-Ecological Model to barriers to implementation of ACL injury prevention programs: a systematic review.
J Sport Health Sci, 8 (2019), pp. 8-16
C. Bolling, W. van Mechelen, H. Pasman, E. Verhagen.
Context matters: revisiting the first step of the 'sequence of prevention' of sports injuries.
Sports Med, 48 (2018), pp. 2227-2234
D. Hanson, J. Hanson, P. Vardon, et al.
The injury iceberg: an ecological approach to planning sustainable community safety interventions.
Health Promot J Austr, 16 (2005), pp. 5-10
A. Tong, P. Sainsbury, J. Craig.
Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.
Int J Qual Health C, 19 (2007), pp. 349-357
M. Vaismoradi, H. Turunen, T. Bondas.
Content analysis and thematic analysis: implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study.
Nurs Health Sci, 15 (2013), pp. 398-405
A. Donaldson, J. Cook, B. Gabbe, D.G. Lloyd, W. Young, C.F. Finch.
Bridging the gap between content and context: establishing expert consensus on the content of an exercise training program to prevent lower-limb injuries.
Clin J Sport Med, 25 (2015), pp. 221-229
T. Soligard, G. Myklebust, K. Steffen, et al.
Comprehensive warm-up programme to prevent injuries in young female footballers: cluster randomised controlled trial.
BMJ, 337 (2008), pp. a2469
I. Coyne.
Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear boundaries?.
V. Braun, V. Clarke.
Using thematic analysis in psychology.
Qual Res Psychol, 3 (2006), pp. 77-101
I. Korstjens, A. Moser.
Series: practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: trustworthiness and publishing.
Eur J Gen, 24 (2018), pp. 120-124
C. Bolling, S. Delfino Barboza, W. van Mechelen, H Pasman.
Letting the cat out of the bag: athletes, coaches and physiotherapists share their perspectives on injury prevention in elite sports.
Br J Sports Med, 54 (2020), pp. 871-877
J. O'Brien, C.F. Finch.
Injury prevention exercise programs for professional soccer: understanding the perceptions of the end-users.
Clin J Sport Med, 27 (2017), pp. 1-9
H. Lindblom, S. Carlfjord, M. Hägglund.
Adoption and use of an injury prevention exercise program in female football: a qualitative study among coaches.
Scand J Med Sci Sports, 28 (2018), pp. 1295-1303
D.I. Ling, N.A. Cepeda, N. Marom, B. Jivanelli, R.G. Marx.
Injury prevention programmes with plyometric and strengthening exercises improve on-field performance: a systematic review.
J ISAKOS, 5 (2020), pp. 48-59
A. Plummer, H. Mugele, K. Steffen, J. Stoll, F. Mayer, J. Müller.
General versus sports-specific injury prevention programs in athletes: a systematic review on the effects on performance.
D. Hoffman, D. Dwyer, S. Bowe, P. Clifton, P. Gastin.
Is injury associated with team performance in elite Australian football? 20 years of player injury and team performance data that include measures of individual player value.
Br J Sports Med, 54 (2020), pp. 475-479
D. Van Tiggelen, S. Wickes, V. Stevens, P. Roosen, E. Witvrouw.
Effective prevention of sports injuries: a model integrating efficacy, efficiency, compliance and risk-taking behaviour.
Br J Sports Med, 42 (2008), pp. 648-652
N.F.N. Bittencourt, W.H. Meeuwisse, L.D. Mendonça, A. Nettel-Aguirre, J.M. Ocarino, S.T. Fonseca.
Complex systems approach for sports injuries: moving from risk factor identification to injury pattern recognition—Narrative review and new concept.
Br J Sports Med, 50 (2016), pp. 1309-1314
J. Tee, S. McLaren, B. Jones.
Sports injury prevention is complex: we need to invest in better processes, not singular solutions.
Sports Med, 50 (2020), pp. 689-702
A. Donaldson, A. Callaghan, M. Bizzini, A. Jowett, P. Keyzer, M. Nicholson.
A concept mapping approach to identifying the barriers to implementing an evidence-based sports injury prevention programme.
Injury prev, 25 (2019), pp. 244-251
N. Mays, C. Pope.
Qualitative research in health care. Assessing quality in qualitative research.
K. Eisenhardt.
Building theories from case study research.
The Qualitative Researcher's Companion,
Kate Webster E, Timothy Hewett E, Julian Feller A.
Anterior cruciate ligament injuries in Australian Rules Football: Incidence, prevention and return to play outcomes.
Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine, (2021), pp. 33-41
Andrea Bruder M, Kay Crossley M, Andrea Mosler B, Brooke Patterson, Melissa Haberfield, Alex Donaldson.
Co-creation of a sport-specific anterior cruciate ligament injury risk reduction program for women: A concept mapping approach.
Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 23 (2020), pp. 353-360
Copyright © 2021. Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia
Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy

Subscribe to our newsletter

Article options
en pt
Cookies policy Política de cookies
To improve our services and products, we use "cookies" (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here. Utilizamos cookies próprios e de terceiros para melhorar nossos serviços e mostrar publicidade relacionada às suas preferências, analisando seus hábitos de navegação. Se continuar a navegar, consideramos que aceita o seu uso. Você pode alterar a configuração ou obter mais informações aqui.