Links & Downloads
Braz. J. Phys. Ther. 2016; 20: 494-501
10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0191 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0191
Abstract:Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of prophylactic, non-invasive ventilation (NIV) on respiratory function in seven- to 16-year-old children in the post-operative phase of cardiac surgery. Method: A randomized, controlled trial with 50 children who had undergone cardiac surgery with median sternotomy. After extubation, patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups: control group (n=26), which received instructions regarding posture, early ambulation, and cough stimulation, and CPAP group (continuous positive airway pressure; n=24), which received the same instructions as the control group and CPAP=10 cmH20 twice daily for 30 minutes from the 1st to the 5th post-operative day (POD). As a primary outcome, lung function was evaluated before and on the 1st, 3rd, and 5th PODs with measures of respiratory rate (RR), tidal volume (TV), slow vital capacity (SVC), inspiratory capacity (IC), minute volume (MV), peak expiratory flow (PEF), and maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP). As secondary outcomes, the time of hospitalization and intensive care were recorded. A mixed, linear regression model and z-test were used to analyze respiratory function, considering p<0.05. Results: All variables, except RR and MV, showed a significant drop on the 1st POD, with gradual recovery; however, only MIP had returned to pre-operative values on the 5th POD in both groups. The RR showed a significant increase on the 1st POD, with a gradual reduction but without returning to baseline. In the intergroup analysis, significant improvement (p=0.04) was observed only in PEF in the CPAP group on the 1st DPO. The length of hospitalization and intensive care showed no significant differences. Conclusion: NIV was safe and well accepted in this group of patients, and the protocol used was effective in improving PEF on the 1st DPO in the CPAP group.
Keywords:cardiac surgical procedures, pediatrics, continuous positive airway pressure, non-invasive ventilation, physical therapy
1. Boisseau N, Rabary O, Padovani B, Staccini P, Mouroux J, Grimaud D, et al. Improvement of “dynamic analgesia” does not decrease atelectasis after thoracotomy. Br J Anaesth. 2001;87(4):564-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bja/87.4.564. PMid:11878725.
2. Barbosa RAG, Carmona MJC. Avaliação da função pulmonar em pacientes submetidos à cirurgia cardíaca com circulação extracorpórea. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2002;52(6):689-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-70942002000600005. PMid:19475240.
3. Higgins TL, Estafanous FG, Loop FD, Beck GJ, Blum JM, Paranandi L. Stratification of morbidity and mortality outcome by preoperative risk factors in coronary artery bypass patients: a clinical severity score. JAMA. 1992;267(17):2344-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.1992.03480170070031. PMid:1564774.
4. Altschuler E. A breathing tape: a non-invasive prophylaxis/preventative measure for post-surgical atelectasis which supplies, rather than requires, patient motivation. Med Hypotheses. 1999;53(1):78-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/mehy.1998.0721. PMid:10499832.
5. Meduri GU, Cook TR, Turner RE, Cohen M, Leeper KV. Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in status asthmaticus. Chest. 1996;110(3):767-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1378/chest.110.3.767. PMid:8797425.
6. Silva DCB, Foronda FAK, Troster EJ. Ventilação não invasiva em pediatria. J Pediatr. 2003;79(8):161-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.2223/JPED.1092.
7. Olper L, Redaelli V, Corbetta D. Efficacy of non-invasive ventilation for cardiothoracic surgical patients: a systematic review. It J Physiother. 2011;1(1):17-26.
8. Essouri S, Chevret L, Durand P, Haas V, Fauroux B, Devictor D. Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation: five years of experience in a pediatric intensive care unit. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2006;7(4):329-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.PCC.0000225089.21176.0B. PMid:16738493.
9. Kovacikova L, Dobos D, Zahorec M. Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation for bilateral diaphragm paralysis after pediatric cardiac surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2009;8(1):171-2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1510/icvts.2008.187096. PMid:18835855.
10. Najaf-Zadeh A, Leclerc F. Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation for acute respiratory failure in children: a concise review. Ann Intensive Care. 2011;1(1):15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2110-5820-1-15. PMid:21906346.
11. Gupta P, Kuperstock JE, Hashmi S, Arnolde V, Gossett JM, Prodhan P, et al. Efficacy and predictors of success of noninvasive ventilation for prevention of extubation failure in critically ill children with heart disease. Pediatr Cardiol. 2013;34(4):964-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00246-012-0590-3. PMid:23196891.
12. Costa LOP, Maher CG, Lopes AD, Noronha MA, Costa LCM. Transparent reporting of studies relevant to physical therapy practice. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2011;15(4):267-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552011005000009. PMid:21975681.
13. Caséca MB, Andrade LB, Britto MCA. Pulmonary function assessment in children and teenagers before and after surgical treatment for rheumatic valve disease. J Pediatr. 2006;82(2):144-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.2223/JPED.1462. PMid:16614770.
14. Freitas FS, Parreira VF, Ibiapina CC. Aplicação clínica do pico de fluxo da tosse: uma revisão de literatura. Fisioter Mov. 2010;23(3):495-502. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-51502010000300016.
15. Franco AM, Torres FCC, Simon ISL, Morales D, Rodrigues AJ. Avaliação da ventilação não-invasiva com dois níveis de pressão positiva nas vias aéreas após cirurgia cardíaca. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2011;26(4):582-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1678-9741.20110048. PMid:22358273.
16. Zarbock A, Mueller E, Netzer S, Gabriel A, Feindt P, Kindgen-Milles D. Prophilactic nasal continuous positive arway pressure following cardiac surgery protects from postoperative pulmonare complications. Chest. 2009;135(5):1252-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1378/chest.08-1602. PMid:19017864.
17. Jousela I, Räsänen J, Verkkala K, Lamminen A, Mäkeläinen A, Nikki P. Continuous positive airway pressure by mask in patients after coronary surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1994;38(4):311-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.1994.tb03899.x. PMid:8067215.
18. Pinilla JC, Oleniuk FH, Tan L, Rebeyka I, Tanna N, Wilkinson A, et al. Use of a nasal continuous positive airway pressure mask in the treatment postoperative atelectasias in aortocoronary bypass surgery. Crit Care Med. 1990;18(8):836-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003246-199008000-00008. PMid:2199148.